Task 2: Evidence and Example Crafting Library (Writing)
A practical library to build convincing evidence and clean examples for Task 2. Browse seven “shelves” with formulas, verbs, hedges, and link-back lines. Learn how to use scenarios, mini cases, safe data hints, and balanced counterexamples. Includes quick selection flow, repair clinic, and timed drills so your paragraphs sound credible, specific, and examiner friendly.
Library Map: choose the right evidence in 20 seconds
- Identify your claim.
- Pick one shelf below.
- Add a mechanism line that explains how it works.
- Close with a link-back to the question.
Shelf 1. Typical Scenario
Formula: In [context], when [action] happens, [group] experiences [result].
Model: In large cities, when buses get priority lanes, commuters arrive on time more often.
Mechanism: Shorter queues reduce knock-on delays.
Link-back: This supports investment in public transport.
Shelf 2. Mini Case
Formula: In [place or sector], [measure] led to [change] within [timeframe].
Model: In one district, lending laptops raised homework submissions within a term.
Mechanism: Devices remove access gaps after school hours.
Link-back: Therefore, targeted funding improves equity.
Shelf 3. Data Hint (safe numbers)
Use rounded figures when the task allows approximate support.
Frames
- about one third of applicants choose evening classes
- roughly half of trips are under five kilometers
- nearly a quarter switched to online billing
Do not invent precise statistics. Keep numbers modest and plausible.
Shelf 4. Authority and Research
Formula: [Source type] reports suggest that [finding].
Model: School records indicate that recorded lessons improve revision rates.
Mechanism: Replays let weaker students review key steps.
Link-back: This makes the policy effective for mixed ability classes.
Shelf 5. Analogy
Formula: [New policy] works like [simple system], because [shared feature].
Model: Congestion pricing works like a queue ticket, because paying spreads arrivals over time.
Use analogies briefly, then switch back to the main topic.
Shelf 6. Counterexample for balance
Formula: Although [risk], [condition] limits the problem.
Model: Although remote work can isolate teams, weekly in-person sprints maintain collaboration.
Purpose: Show awareness and control, not just support.
Shelf 7. Localisation
Formula: In [your city or sector], [policy] helps [group] because [specific barrier].
Model: In coastal towns, off-peak visitor caps protect beaches during festival weeks.
Mechanism: Lower footfall lets services recover.
Link-back: This protects long-term tourism income.
Evidence Verbs Ladder
shows, suggests, indicates, is linked to, tends to, leads to, contributes to, helps to, reduces, increases
Hedges
often, typically, in many cases, on balance, to some extent
Link-Back Lines
- Therefore, this addresses the question of [cost/access/health].
- As a result, the advantages can outweigh the drawbacks.
- Consequently, the proposal supports the stated goal.
PEEL E in one minute
- Point: One clear claim.
- Evidence: Choose a shelf.
- Explanation: Add the mechanism.
- Link: Tie to the task focus.
- Extension: Add a one-line counter or condition.
Repair Clinic: before and after
Before
People benefit from online learning and it is good.
After
Online learning widens access for shift workers. In one adult college, recorded lessons increased completion rates in one term. Replays let learners study after work. Therefore, the policy improves equity.
Why it works
Scenario plus mini case, clear mechanism, link-back.
Quick Selector Table
| Goal | Best shelf | Starter frame |
|---|---|---|
| Prove practicality | Typical scenario | In [context], when [action] happens, [result]. |
| Show it works somewhere | Mini case | In [place], [measure] led to [change]. |
| Add scale | Data hint | About one third… nearly a quarter… |
| Add credibility | Authority | Records indicate that… |
| Balance risk | Counterexample | Although [risk], [condition] limits it. |
| Local relevance | Localisation | In [your area], [policy] helps [group]. |
Example Packs by Question Type
Opinion
Claim: Cities should fund buses.
Evidence: In one corridor, bus lanes cut peak journeys within a month.
Mechanism: Priority reduces stoppages.
Link: This justifies higher transport budgets.
Discussion
Claim: Investment is preferable to fare cuts.
Evidence: Records show that fleet upgrades reduce cancellations more than small fare changes.
Link: Reliability matters more for commuters.
Adv vs Disadv
Claim: Tourism helps small towns, yet strains services.
Evidence: Visitor caps during holidays keep rubbish volumes manageable.
Link: Controlled growth protects benefits.
Problem Solution
Claim: Low recycling capture stems from poor bin placement.
Evidence: Blocks with floor-level bins collect more sorted waste.
Link: Design fixes behavior.
Five Fast Drills
- Shelf swap
Write one claim. Produce two different evidences: a scenario and a mini case. - Mechanism line
For any example, add because or which to explain how the change works. - Balance line
Attach an although clause that shows control of risk. - Data detox
Replace any exact claim you cannot support with a safe data hint. - PEEL E sprint
Write a 5 sentence body: Point, Evidence, Explanation, Link, Extension.
Two Minute End Audit
- One clear claim per body
- Evidence chosen from the right shelf
- Mechanism explains cause and effect
- Balanced with a limiter or counter line
- No invented precise statistics
- Link-back ties to the task question
Use this library while drafting. Select a shelf, write the mechanism, and close with a link-back. Your examples will sound concrete, balanced, and reliable.